In the essay Island Civilization, Roderick Frazier Nash paints many pictures of what
the Fourth Millennium could look like. Before he explores the many options of
the Fourth Millennium, Nash challenges the reader to reflect on not only the
Third Millennium (the current one), but also past millenniums. In Nash’s
opinion, humans have greatly contributed to the downfall of the planet Earth,
and he believes that at this point there are only four possible outcomes for
the next millennium. The four outcomes that Nash thinks could exist for the
Fourth Millennium are the wasted scenario, the garden scenario, the future
primitive, and the island civilization.
First,
Nash describes, in my opinion, the worst possible outcome of Earth, the wasted
scenario. Humans have neglected every other species on the planet and have
essentially driven it into the ground. Since everything is basically destroyed,
we can either continue to live in this landfill, or travel to another planet to
destroy. I think that this could very easily happen to the Earth today. If we
as humans aren’t careful and don’t take care of the planet, it will be cluttered
before we know it.
The
second scenario is the garden scenario. It describes a world where the human
race perfects every weather process or natural thing. In this reality
everything revolves around humans and we have complete control over everything.
Although it is more efficient than the wasted scenario, I don’t think the
garden scenario would work because there is no diversity between organisms.
Also, it seems too good to be true for humans.
The
next scenario is called the future primitive. This scenario would happen if the
human race completely did away with all the technological advances that we have
made in the last ten-thousand years. Some of us would resort back to the hunting
and gathering style of survival, while others would fend off for themselves for
awhile. I don’t think this scenario would prove productive because it would be
doing away with everything we have accomplished so far. All of the innovators
and geniuses creations would be lost forever, and their work would be for
nothing. Also, I feel that we would eventually invent things we had in the
future to make jobs and survival easier.
Finally,
last scenario proposed by Nash fills in very nicely with the title. In the
island civilization outcome, humans would find the perfect way to coincide with
nature, without destroying or controlling it. Instead of limiting the
wilderness, we would limit our expansion as civilization. I feel like this
would mean less highways, restaurants, and gas stations outside of the main
designated towns. In my opinion, this civilization would work pretty well
because nature and humans would live in harmony. The only setback would be the
possibility of running out of room to contain the human race.
In
conclusion, all four of the scenarios for the Fourth Millennium proposed by
Nash in this essay have their advantages and disadvantages. However, I feel
like these situations don’t matter all too much. I think the purpose Nash wrote
this essay is to make the reader think and understand that no matter what
scenario the Fourth Millennium turns out to fulfill, the only thing we can do
right now is take care of the planet we live in.
Greg, your response to Nash's essay was a very organized and detailed summary to his different outcomes of the fourth millennium. I liked the fact that you put in your own opinion into the end of each of the main paragraphs detailing Nash's different outcomes. I thought your opinions were very interesting and insightful to read. I also agree with what you said in your conclusion about how we can only take care of the planet right now, and only time will tell what the fourth millennium will bring.
ReplyDelete